Poorly implemented academies
The challenge of knowledge transfer in the Social Sciences and Humanities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61283/3cy80z34Keywords:
Academy, transfer, Social Sciences, HumanitiesAbstract
In the presentation of a conference held at the University of Manchester in April 2019 under the title Academics, Professionals and Publics: Changes in the Ecologies of Knowledge Work, Eric Lybeck, founder of the organisation Civic Sociology, raised the paradox that probably never before in history has knowledge played such a fundamental role in the development of human life, but also never before has there been such a growing distrust of the knowledge generated by scientists, experts and, in general, by those who are (we are) professionally engaged in the work of producing knowledge. And he invited us not to dismiss this paradox with the disdain of the "sage" towards the "layperson", but to reflect on the responsibility that the scientific community itself might be taking in nurturing this distancing: "Could these dynamics be caused by the way in which knowledge is organised institutionally, politically and publicly", Lybeck asked. An invitation, as we said, to rethink our practices and ways of doing things, the criteria with which we give value to the research we carry out, the interests (not necessarily spurious) we serve or the use given to the knowledge we produce.
Downloads
References
Comisión Europea (2013): Horizon 2020. Work programme 2014-2015. Part 16: Science with and for Society. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/main/h2020-wp1415-swfs_en.pdf
Comisión Europea (2017): Horizon 2020. Work programme 2018-2020. Part 16: Science with and for Society. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-swfs_en.pdf
Comisión Europea (2021): Horizon Europe. Strategic Plan 2021-2024.
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/horizon_europe_strategic_plan_2021-2024.pdf
Dijstelboem, H.; Huisman, F.; Miedema, F. y Mijnhardt, W. (2013): Science in transition: Position paper. Why science does not work as it should and what to do about it. https://scienceintransition.nl/en/about-science-in-transition/position-paper
Donovan, C. (2008): “The Australian Research Quality Framework: A live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental and cultural returns of publicly funded research”, New Directions for Evaluation, 118, pp. 47–60.
Holmes, B. J. (2017): “On the co-production of research: Why we should say what we mean, mean what we say, and learn as we go”. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/09/21/on-the-co-production-of-research-why-we-should-say-what-we-mean-mean-what-we-say-and-learn-as-we-go/
Holmes, B. J.; Best, A.; Davies, H.; Hunter, D. J.; Kelly, M.P.; Marshall, M. y Rycroft-Malone, J. (2016): “Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: A call to action”, Evidence & Policy. A Journal of Research Debate and Practice, 13 (3), pp. 539-560.
IAMCR (2018): “IAMCR condemns political interference in australian research funding”. Comunicado de la International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR), 12 de noviembre de 2018. https://iamcr.org/clearinghouse/australia-interference
IAMCR (2020): “IAMCR opposes Australian policy”. Comunicado de la International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR), 17 de julio de 2020. https://iamcr.org/clearinghouse/australian-degree-fee-increase
Martin, S. (2019): “Co-production of social research: Strategies for engaged scholarship”, Public Money & Management, 30 (4), pp. 211-218.
Nogrady, B. (2018): “Australian academics fear political interference following vetoed projects”, Nature, 30 de octubre.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07221-3
Ofir, Z.; Schwandt, T.; Duggan, C. y McLean, R. (2016): Research Quality Plus (RQ+): A holistic approach to evaluating research. International Development Research Centre. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/handle/10625/56528
Samuel, G. N. y Derrick, G. E. (2015): “Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014”, Research Evaluation, 24, pp. 229-241.
VSNU, KNAW y NOW [Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) y Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NOW)] (2009): Standard Evaluation Protocol 2009- 2015. Protocol for research assessments in the Netherlands. Disponible en https://www.uu.nl/sites/default/files/sep2009-2015.pdf
VSNU, KNAW y NOW [Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) y Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NOW)] (2016): Standard Evaluation Protocol 2015-2021. Protocol for research assessments in the Netherlands. Disponible en https://www.universiteitenvannederland.nl/files/documenten/Domeinen/Onderzoek/SEP2015-2021.pdf
VSNU, KNAW y NOW [Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) y Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NOW)] (2020): Strategy Evaluation Protocol 2021-2027. Disponible en https://www.universiteitenvannederland.nl/files/documenten/Domeinen/Onderzoek/SEP_2021-2027.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Manuel Martínez Nicolás (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Política de acceso abierto
Se permite el acceso libre y abierto de cualquier interesado a todos los contenidos de los números de la revista, sin costo alguno, pudiendo imprimir y trasladar todos los artículos, con la única condición de precisar la fuente y la autoría.
La revista: a) no cobra a las autorías costes por el procesamiento de los artículos ni por el envío de los mismos, b) mantiene el copyright para los autores sin restricciones, c) facilita a los autores conservar sus derechos de publicación sin limitaciones.
La Revista Internacional de Investigación y Transferencia en Comunicación y Ciencias Sociales (INTRACOM) es una obra original gestionada por Activa 19 Comunicaciones. Todos los artículos incluidos en la Revista son obra original de sus respectivas autorías. Esta Revista se ofrece libremente a la comunidad científica y académica sin coste alguno y libera los contenidos de acuerdo a la licencia "Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 CC BY-NC-SA" del proyecto Creative Commons dispuesta en la siguiente url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode